Politics of Yiddish

Part 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 On the Politics of Yiddish
Part 3 Politics, Ideology, and Scholarship
Chapter 4 Yiddishism and Judaism
Chapter 5 Yiddish language politics in the Ukraine (1930-1936)
Chapter 6 What was going on at the 1935 Yivo Conference?
Chapter 7 The Czernowitz Conference in retrospect
Chapter 8 The politics of research on spoken Yiddish
Part 9 Communities, Centres, and Cities
Chapter 10 Yiddish socialist press in New York, 1880s-1920s
Chapter 11 Yiddish in orthodox communities of Jerusalem
Chapter 12 Shloyme Mikhoels and his theatre
Chapter 13 Writers must eat: the New York City Yiddish Writers Group of the Work Progress Administration
Chapter 14 Petticoat Lane and the North-West Passage (London, 1880-1940)
Chapter 15 Art and politics: the case of the New York Artef Theatre (1925-1940)
Part 16 Language, Folklore, and Literature
Chapter 17 Zmires Purim—the third phase of Jewish carnavalistic folk-literature
Chapter 18 Dovid Bergelson's Bam Dnieper: a passport to Moscow
Chapter 19 Dovid Holfstein—our first wonder
Chapter 20 The Aston corpus of Soviet Yiddish lexicon
Chapter 21 A Vilna folklorist's collection: Structural analysis of Yiddish riddles
Chapter 22 Mr Khauruchenka, Miss Shaihets, Mrs Hoika and others: the origin of some other unusual family names
Chapter 23 List of contributors

The geolinguistic aspects are obvious, especially in terms of preserving the culture 'of our fathers,' government language policies and social developments antithetical to Yiddish, and so on....It is undeniable that Yiddish serves as a busy battleground for liguists with strong opinions and also as a subject for non-Jewish siciolinguists interested in the conflicts between favored and less favored languages growing and others fading in popularity or prestige, etc. The Yinglish if I may call it that, in which this book is now and then written, Yiddish words and expressions popping up with great regularity in a basically English text, is also fascinating. That is still another linguistic phenomenon in which sociolinguists ought to take more interest than they have heretofore done.