Sentimentalism in Nineteenth-Century America

Literary and Cultural Practices

Edited by Mary G. De Jong

Hardback - £82.00

Publication date:

07 June 2013

Length of book:

242 pages

Publisher

Fairleigh Dickinson University Press

ISBN-13: 9781611476057

Sentimentalism emerged in eighteenth-century Europe as a moral philosophy founded on the belief that individuals are able to form relationships and communities because they can, by an effort of the imagination, understand one another’s feelings. American authors of both sexes who accepted these views cultivated readers’ sympathy with others in order to promote self-improvement, motivate action to relieve suffering, reinforce social unity, and build national identity. Entwined with domesticity and imperialism and finding expression in literature and in public and private rituals, sentimentalism became America’s dominant ideology by the early nineteenth century. Sentimental writings and practices had political uses, some reformist and some repressive. They played major roles in the formation of bourgeois consciousness.

The first new collection of scholarly essays on American sentimentalism since 1999, this volume brings together ten recent studies, eight published here for the first time. The Introduction assesses the current state of sentimentalism studies; the Afterword reflects on sentimentalism as a liberal discourse central to contemporary political thought as well as literary studies. Other contributors, exploring topics characteristic of the field today, examine nineteenth-century authors’ treatments of education, grief, social inequalities, intimate relationships, and community.


This volume has several distinctive features. It illustrates sentimentalism’s appropriation of an array of literary forms (advice literature, personal narrative, and essays on education and urban poverty as well as poetry and the novel) objects (memorial volumes), and cultural practices (communal singing, benevolence). It includes four essays on poetry, less frequently studied than fiction. It identifies internal contradictions that eventually fractured sentimentalism’s viability as a belief system—yet suggests that the protean sentimental mode accommodated itself to revisionary and ironized literary uses, thus persisting long after twentieth-century critics pronounced it a casualty of the Civil War. This collection also offers fresh perspectives on three esteemed authors not usually classified as sentimentalists—Sarah Piatt, Walt Whitman, and Henry James—thus demonstrating that sentimental topics and techniques informed “realism” and “modernism” as they emerged Offering close readings of nineteenth-century American texts and practices, this book demonstrates both the limits of sentimentalism and its wide and lasting influence.



De Jong, coeditor (with Earl Yarington) of Popular Nineteeth-Century Women Writers and the Literary Marketplace (2007), has brought together ten essays on sentimentalism in American literature and culture. The contributions--most by rising scholars--are grouped into three sections: "Rethinking Sentimental Motherhood," "Reform and Sympathetic Identification," and "Loss, Death, Mourning, and Grief." The diversity of the essays supports De Jong's main assertions: contemporary criticism views sentimentalism as a protean term applicable to literary and nonliterary forms; sentimentalism characterizes works representing liberal, progressive, and reactionary stances; and the concept is associated not solely with femininity. Several essays focus on men: novelist Donald Grant Mitchell and poets Walt Whitman and Henry James, who all dealt with sentimentality. Mary Louise Kete, author of Sentimental Collaborations, contributes an illuminating afterword (which could well have substituted for De Jong's less cogent introduction) contextualizing the essays and offering an overview of current scholarship. Especially significant is Kete's discussion of sympathy ("the definitive affect of sentiment") and its relationship to the liberal self. This collection offers thoughtful readings of the texts considered, although the essays as a whole do not advance any particular overarching argument. Summing Up: Recommended. For collections serving graduate students and researchers.